Q1. How can you tell whether a mark on a plant fossil is really a feeding trace? What other possibilities are there?
A1. To decide whether a mark is true insect damage, researchers compare its repeated, patterned shape with other possibilities and interpret it in context—how and where the fossil was preserved—much like detective work.
Learn moreQ2. Don’t the insects that made the damage fossilize too? How can you tell who made the trace?
A2. Not usually. Leaf damage is common in the fossil record, but the insects that made it are much harder to preserve.
Learn moreQ3. How can we tell that a mark on a leaf is insect feeding rather than accidental damage?
A3. One key line of evidence is the repeated occurrence of the same pattern across multiple areas or specimens.
Learn moreQ4-1. Can you tell from feeding traces whether the damage occurred while the plant was alive or after it had died?
A4-1. Yes—sometimes. If the damage shows signs of the plant’s healing response, it likely happened while the plant was still alive.
Learn moreQ4-2. What is “reaction tissue”?
A4-2. Reaction tissue is the visible thickening, hardening, or darkening of plant tissue that forms around a wound when a leaf is eaten while the plant is still alive.
Learn moreQ5. To what extent can the taxonomic group of an insect that created a feeding pattern be identified based on the trace itself?
A5. In most cases, it is difficult to identify the exact taxonomic group of the organism that left a feeding trace, although in some instances it can be narrowed down to the genus.
Learn more
